← Interstellar Blends
Learn

The 13 Hallmarks of Aging

Nine hallmarks in 2013, twelve in the 2023 update, and a thirteenth proposed in 2022. Each one defined, with the biological pathways behind it and the paper that named it.

Open the interactive version →
Longevity · the biology of aging

What are the 13 hallmarks of aging?

Aging research has converged on a set of root drivers — the hallmarks of aging. Every blend is formulated to support the pathways behind them. Each hallmark links to the peer-reviewed paper that defined it, so you can verify the science yourself. This is educational; it is not a claim to treat, cure, or reverse aging.

Is it 12 or 13 hallmarks of aging?

Both numbers are right, and they refer to different things. López-Otín and colleagues defined nine hallmarks in Cell in 2013. Their 2023 update added disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation and dysbiosis, bringing the canonical list to twelve — which is the number most sources now quote.

This page lists thirteen because it also carries extracellular-matrix stiffening, proposed at the 2022 Copenhagen ageing meeting. It is marked emerging wherever it appears, it carries its own citation, and it is not part of the canonical twelve. We show it because the evidence for it is real and growing, and we label it because it has not yet been adopted.

So: twelve if you want the canon, thirteen if you want the canon plus what is coming next — and on this page you can always tell which is which.

How the hallmark count grewThree rows of markers. The 2013 row shows nine. The 2023 row shows twelve, with the three additions ringed. A separate lower row shows one outlined marker for the emerging thirteenth, proposed in 2022 and not part of the canonical twelve.2013CELLnine2023CELLtwelveRINGED: MACROAUTOPHAGY · INFLAMMATION · DYSBIOSIS2022a thirteenth, proposedEMERGING · NOT PART OF THE CANONICAL TWELVE
Nine hallmarks were defined in 2013. The 2023 update added three — disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation and dysbiosis — making twelve. Extracellular-matrix stiffening was proposed separately in 2022 and is shown here, and throughout this page, as emerging rather than canonical.
Where the hallmarks share machineryThirteen numbered points on a baseline, one per hallmark. Arcs above the line join hallmarks that share a biological pathway on this page; thicker arcs carry more than one shared pathway.12345678910111213
Ten of the 49 pathways on this page appear under more than one hallmark — the arcs are those crossings. The longevity gene alone bridges four hallmarks and galectin-3 bridges three, which is why the thirteen behave less like a list than a web. The other crossings are damage checkpoint, the stress-resistance switch (FOXO), antioxidant defense, the master antioxidant, cellular cleanup, growth restraint, energy sensing and calms inflammation. Counted from the rows below each time this page is built, so the picture and the rows cannot drift apart.
1

Genomic instability

Every cell you own takes on the order of tens of thousands of DNA lesions a day, and almost all of them are repaired before you wake up.

The damage is not the variable. Repair capacity is. The damage checkpoint halts a dividing cell until the break is mended, because a cell that divides through damage copies the damage forward. Antioxidant defense and the master antioxidant reduce the oxidative load that creates the lesions in the first place, and the longevity gene and the stress-resistance switch (FOXO) set how much of the cell's budget goes to maintenance rather than growth.

What accumulates is not one catastrophic error but the residue of a billion small ones — in nuclear DNA and in the separate genome the mitochondria carry. Genomic instability sits first in the list because most of the hallmarks beneath it inherit from it.

45 blends support this
The story of Genomic instability

In 1927 Hermann Muller pointed X-rays at fruit flies and produced mutations to order, which was the first hard proof that the genome could be damaged by something outside it. It took another forty years to establish the stranger half of the story: that the genome is being damaged constantly from the inside, by the ordinary chemistry of being alive, and that every living cell runs a repair operation around the clock simply to stay where it is.

2

Telomere attrition

A cell keeps count of its own divisions, and the tally is written at the ends of its chromosomes.

Telomeres are repeated sequences that cap each chromosome and keep its end from being read as a broken strand. Most body cells cannot copy those ends completely, so a little is spent at every division. Protects DNA caps is the maintenance side of that ledger, and the longevity gene governs how much the cell invests in it.

When a telomere falls below a critical length the cell stops dividing and either retires permanently or dies. Telomere length is therefore two things at once: a record of divisions already spent, and a ceiling on the divisions that remain.

20 blends support this
The story of Telomere attrition

Leonard Hayflick noticed in 1961 that human cells in culture would divide about fifty times and then stop — not die, not degenerate, simply stop. The field's settled view at the time was that cells in culture were immortal and any failure was the experimenter's fault. Hayflick's result was treated as contamination for years before it was accepted as a property of the cell itself, and the counting mechanism he had found without seeing it turned out to be sitting at the ends of the chromosomes.

3

Epigenetic alterations

Two cells carrying identical DNA can behave nothing like one another, and what separates them is not the text but the annotation.

Chemical marks on DNA and on the histone proteins it coils around decide which genes are readable in which tissue. Those marks drift with age, so cells begin expressing the wrong program for where they are. The longevity gene family sits directly on this machinery, and the stress-resistance switch (FOXO) is one of the switches it acts through.

The drift is regular enough to be read as a clock — methylation patterns estimate biological age to within a few years — and epigenetic change is among the very few hallmarks that laboratory work has shown to be partly reversible.

18 blends support this
The story of Epigenetic alterations

For most of the twentieth century the genome was understood as the thing you could not change, and everything else as noise on top of it. The annotation turned out to matter as much as the text. A liver cell and a neuron hold the same three billion letters and read almost none of the same pages, and the system that decides which pages are open is chemical, inherited through division, and — unlike the sequence underneath it — editable.

4

Loss of proteostasis

A protein is a chain that has to fold into one precise shape, and a chain that folds wrongly does not simply fail. It interferes.

The cell runs a standing operation to keep its folded population intact: the heat shock response deploys chaperones that refold what has come undone, cellular cleanup and plaque clearance remove what cannot be saved, and antioxidant defense with the master antioxidant limits the oxidative damage that unfolds proteins to begin with.

With age that operation is outpaced. Misfolded proteins accumulate, clump, and obstruct the machinery around them — which is why proteostasis is studied as a shared upstream failure rather than a problem belonging to any one tissue.

42 blends support this
The story of Loss of proteostasis

In 1962 Ferruccio Ritossa found puffs along the chromosomes of fruit flies whose incubator had been accidentally overheated. He had discovered the heat shock response, and it was nearly unpublishable — a reviewer saw no interest in it. It is now understood as one of the most conserved emergency systems in biology, present in essentially everything alive, and the cell's first answer when its proteins start to come apart.

5

Disabled macroautophagy

The cell does not only build. It eats itself, deliberately, every day.

Autophagy is bulk recycling: worn organelles and protein aggregates are wrapped in membrane, delivered to the lysosome, dismantled, and the parts returned to stock. Cellular cleanup is that route. It is held in check by growth signaling and released when fuel is scarce, which is why growth restraint and energy sensing sit beside it here.

Capacity falls with age, so the debris the other hallmarks generate is cleared more slowly and accumulates. Macroautophagy was named a hallmark in its own right in the 2023 update, having previously been counted as one part of proteostasis.

36 blends support this
The story of Disabled macroautophagy

Yoshinori Ohsumi spent years watching yeast starve under a microscope, because starving yeast digest themselves and he wanted to see how. The work was unfashionable and the organism unglamorous. He identified the genes that run the process, they turned out to have counterparts in us, and in 2016 he received the Nobel Prize for a mechanism whose entire function is throwing things away.

6

Deregulated nutrient-sensing

Every cell has to answer one question continuously, and it is not a complicated one: is there enough?

A small set of linked pathways carries the answer. Energy sensing reports scarcity and shifts the cell toward maintenance; growth restraint is the brake on building when building is unaffordable; insulin sensitivity, the fat-burning hormone and the appetite & sugar hormone carry the same information at the scale of the whole body, and the longevity gene and growth & survival signaling set what the cell does with it.

With age the balance tips persistently toward growth and storage, in tissues that have no use for either. These are the most studied pathways in longevity biology, because interventions that shift them change lifespan in several model organisms.

51 blends support this
The story of Deregulated nutrient-sensing

In 1935 Clive McCay fed rats substantially less than they wanted and they lived substantially longer. The result was so counterintuitive that it was repeatedly re-run in the expectation of finding the error, and it kept reproducing — in yeast, worms, flies, mice and dogs. Nearly a century later it remains the most replicated life-extending intervention in biology, and the pathways it works through are the ones listed here.

7

Mitochondrial dysfunction

Mitochondria were once free-living bacteria, and they never entirely gave up the arrangement. They still carry their own genome and still divide on their own schedule.

Mitochondrial energy is most of the usable power a cell has. Builds mitochondria is the renewal side — making new ones to replace the failing — and cellular fuel is the currency the process runs on. The mitochondrial pore is the switch that decides whether a damaged mitochondrion is retired, and fat-burning is one of the main substrates fed in.

With age output falls, proportionally more reactive oxygen species leak out, the separate mitochondrial genome accumulates its own damage, and the cycle that retires faulty units slows. The tissues that draw the most power — heart, brain, skeletal muscle — register the shortfall first.

27 blends support this
The story of Mitochondrial dysfunction

Lynn Margulis argued in the 1960s that mitochondria were captured bacteria, swallowed and never digested, and the idea was rejected by journal after journal as fantasy. It is now textbook. The practical consequence is strange and underappreciated: the organelle that powers you keeps a separate genome from the rest of you, inherited only from your mother, and it ages on its own terms.

8

Cellular senescence

Some cells stop dividing and then refuse to leave.

A senescent cell is arrested but alive, and it secretes — inflammatory signals, growth factors, protein-cutting enzymes — into the tissue around it. Clears worn-out cells is the removal route, damage checkpoint is what triggers the arrest in the first place, cell turnover is the replacement that should follow, and galectin-3 and ceramide load are signals that rise in the company these cells keep.

Senescence is protective when you are young: it stops a damaged cell from dividing. It turns costly when senescent cells accumulate faster than the immune system clears them, because a small number of them can disturb a great deal of surrounding tissue.

19 blends support this
The story of Cellular senescence

In 2011 a research group built mice in which senescent cells could be selectively destroyed, and then destroyed them. The animals did not become young, but they held onto muscle, fat and kidney function noticeably longer than their littermates. It was the first clear demonstration that these cells are not merely a marker of aging sitting passively in old tissue — they are part of what is doing it.

9

Stem-cell exhaustion

Most of your body is younger than you are. The lining of your gut is days old; your skeleton is replaced over about a decade.

That replacement runs from resident stem-cell pools, and the signals here are the ones that keep those pools working: tissue renewal signaling, developmental signaling and the vessel growth signal that supplies a regenerating tissue, with muscle, supports BDNF signaling and the bone breakdown signal marking where the balance between loss and replacement is read.

With age the pools shrink, divide less readily and differentiate less faithfully, so replacement slows across blood, muscle, gut lining and skin at once. Stem-cell exhaustion is classed as integrative — largely downstream of the damage above rather than an independent starting point.

29 blends support this
The story of Stem-cell exhaustion

The question of how much of you is original is older than the biology that can answer it. Radiocarbon left in the atmosphere by mid-century weapons testing gave researchers an unintended dating tool: cells built during those years carry the signature, and by reading it you can date tissue directly. Some of it turned out to be remarkably new. Some of it — much of the brain, the lens of the eye — is as old as the person.

10

Altered intercellular communication

No cell ages alone. The hallmark here is not damage in a cell but what the neighbours are told about it.

Cells coordinate through hormones, immune messengers, neural input and direct contact. Calms inflammation and immune support govern the tone of that traffic; blood flow (nitric oxide) is the signal by which vessels answer the tissue they feed; and estrogen, testosterone, lowers cortisol and the reproductive axis carry the endocrine half of the conversation, which shifts markedly with age.

The traffic grows noisier and more inflammatory, and signals that should stay local begin to travel — so damage in one tissue raises the burden carried by others. This is the hallmark that explains how a local failure becomes a systemic one.

59 blends support this
The story of Altered intercellular communication

Parabiosis is a crude experiment with an uncomfortable elegance: join the circulations of a young animal and an old one and see what happens to each. What happens is that both change. Something carried in blood is sufficient to shift how tissue behaves in either direction, which settled a long argument — aging is not only a matter of what has gone wrong inside a given cell, but of what the rest of the body is telling it.

11

Chronic inflammation

Inflammation is supposed to end. The defining feature of this hallmark is that it does not.

Low-grade inflammation climbs steadily with age in the absence of any infection — often called inflammaging. Inflammatory alarm is the sensing arm, calms inflammation the resolving one, and eases pain is where the difference is felt. Tryptophan balance shifts under sustained inflammatory signaling, and galectin-3 rises with it.

Senescent cells, misplaced cellular debris and an immune system that regulates itself less precisely all feed it. Because it is sustained rather than acute it acts on tissue over years. Chronic inflammation was named a hallmark in its own right in the 2023 update.

42 blends support this
The story of Chronic inflammation

Claudio Franceschi proposed the word inflammaging in 2000 to describe something that had been visible in the data for a long time without having a name: a slow, chronic, sterile inflammatory tone that rises with age in people who are not ill. Naming it changed how it was studied. A symptom that belongs to no particular disease tends to be attributed to all of them, or to none.

12

Dysbiosis

You are outnumbered inside your own body, and the balance of that population shifts as you age.

The communities of the gut and the mouth lose diversity, change composition, and press on barriers that grow more permeable. Gut barrier is the one that separates those microbes from host tissue; gum pockets and attachment is the equivalent boundary in the mouth; and parasite burden and h. pylori are specific pressures on the same system.

Because these microbes take part in digestion, immune regulation and the production of metabolites the host actually uses, a disturbance there has consequences well past the gut. Dysbiosis joined the canonical list in 2023 — it could not have been listed earlier, because the tools to measure it did not exist.

26 blends support this
The story of Dysbiosis

For most of medical history the resident microbial population was studied only where it caused disease, because those were the organisms that could be cultured. Most of them cannot be. Sequencing changed what was countable rather than what was there, and a body of organisms that had been present the whole time became, quite suddenly, a system with a composition, a trajectory and an age.

13

Extracellular-matrix stiffening emerging

Aging is usually described as something happening inside cells. A great deal of it happens in the space between them.

The scaffold of collagen, elastin and associated proteins progressively cross-links and loses elasticity. Reduces sugar damage addresses glycation, the reaction of sugars with long-lived proteins that drives much of that cross-linking; tissue remodeling and reduces scarring are the maintenance and repair side; and arterial stiffness, skin and galectin-3 are where stiffening is measured and signalled.

Cells read the mechanical properties of their surroundings and change their behaviour accordingly, so a stiffer matrix is not only a stiffer tissue — it instructs the cells inside it differently. This was proposed as an additional hallmark at the 2022 Copenhagen meeting and is not part of the canonical twelve.

16 blends support this
The story of Extracellular-matrix stiffening

The chemistry is the same one that browns bread. Sugars react with proteins, slowly and without any enzyme directing it, and in long-lived proteins such as collagen the products accumulate because the protein is never replaced. Arterial wall, lens, tendon, skin: tissues that keep their collagen for decades are the tissues where the reaction has time to matter, and stiffness is what it reads out as.

Is the framework itself sound? The strongest case against it

We organize a great deal of this site around the hallmarks, so the honest thing is to publish the best argument that they are the wrong frame — and there is a serious one.

In Ageing Research Reviews, David Gems and João Pedro de Magalhães argue that the hallmarks borrow their authority from the Hallmarks of Cancer without inheriting what made that framework work. Cancer’s hallmarks rest on an agreed causal account; aging’s do not. Their charge is that the list is descriptive rather than explanatory — a catalog of things that change with age, not a theory of why aging happens — and that calling such a catalog a paradigm lends it a weight it has not earned. They titled it after a hoverfly, which survives by resembling a wasp.

A second objection is one this page demonstrates against itself. A hallmark is supposed to be a distinct driver, yet the arc diagram above is drawn from our own map and shows ten biological pathways appearing under more than one hallmark — the longevity gene under four of them. Categories that share that much machinery are not cleanly separable, and the 2023 update acknowledges the interconnection rather than resolving it.

Why we still use it. Because it is the best available map, and a map is worth having even when it is not a theory. What we will not do is let it carry more than it can. Nothing on this site grades a botanical on a hallmark; grades are earned at the level of a biological pathway, against a published endpoint, which is a smaller and more checkable claim. The hallmarks tell you where to look. The pathway evidence is what is actually being asserted.

Who maintains this page, and how to check it

Interstellar Blends. We make botanical concentrates, and this page exists because the hallmarks are the map our formulas are built against — so the map is published in full, with its sources, before anything is sold against it.

567biological pathways, each with the published study behind it
952botanicals, each graded on the strength of its own evidence
3,464distinct studies cited across the site, every one retrievable

The grading rules are published before they are applied and applied mechanically: an A is human-trial evidence on the pathway’s own endpoint and opens a pathway alone; a B is preclinical and never opens one by itself. Where the evidence is weak we show the weak grade rather than hide the ingredient, and where something is tradition rather than evidence we say so on its own page.

What this page does not claim. Nothing here says a botanical reverses aging, and no formula on this site has been shown to. The hallmarks are a research framework for the biology; what we publish is which pathways each hallmark involves, and what grade the published evidence earns for every botanical we put against them. Those are two different things and we keep them apart on purpose.

References — fact-check the science
  1. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. The Hallmarks of Aging. Cell. 2013;153(6):1194–1217. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.039 · PubMed 23746838
  2. López-Otín C, Blasco MA, Partridge L, Serrano M, Kroemer G. Hallmarks of Aging: An Expanding Universe. Cell. 2023;186(2):243–278. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.001 · PubMed 36599349
  3. Schmauck-Medina T, et al. New hallmarks of ageing: a 2022 Copenhagen ageing meeting summary. Aging (Albany NY). 2022;14(16):6829–6839. doi:10.18632/aging.204248 · PubMed 36040386

The original nine hallmarks were defined by López-Otín et al. (Cell, 2013); disabled macroautophagy, chronic inflammation and dysbiosis were added in the 2023 update (twelve total). Extracellular-matrix stiffening (“altered mechanical properties”) is an emerging hallmark proposed at the 2022 Copenhagen meeting, not yet part of the canonical twelve. These statements have not been evaluated by the FDA; this is not medical advice.

Every pathway named, with the published study behind it.  ·  www.interstellar-magic.com ·  Sign in